by Guest on 2014/10/01 06:30:54 PM
Dayum, i really love your program, but i hope the file management/handling gets a bit more efficient.
Tixati works well when you have a few torrents running with low filecount contents, but with growing torrent count it starts up very slowly.
Got an issue where it took minutes to verify the torrents before the GUI was responsive.
I am talking about torrents active which contained a few hundred *.zip files (binary dump files).
What i like best is the funcionality combined with the indeep monitoring features. Love it.
Keep on the good work.
by Guest on 2014/10/08 12:56:20 AM
I don;t know, how the developers count it.
But IMHO (in my humble opinion) after 1.99 comes 1.100 and then 1.101
and later then 1.199 , 1.200 , 1.201
The prefix 2.x should only be implemented, if there is a real major difference,
like e.g. a complete new GUI or switching to a new programing language.
100 if isolated may come after 99, but it is poor practice. Some projects I worked on before failed to account for the need for sorting and if a version number is used in a file system to sort, then 1.100 comes after 1.1 and ahead of 1.2, 1.3...1.9, 1.99, etc. Use of leading zeroes fixes this but needs to be implemented from the start so that v 1.99 is named v 1.099. Then if followed by v 1.100, no problem, it will sort in order.
